Thursday, May 6, 2010

Edge of Darkness DVD

DVD Review by Kam Williams

Headline: Mel Gibson Remake of BBC Mini-Series Arrives on DVD

Mel Gibson might be looking a little long in the tooth, but he hasn’t lost a step in terms of his acting chops, judging this remake of the 6-hour BBC mini-series of the same name first broadcast in 1985. The setting has been shifted from Britain to Boston, where the gritty crime saga starts with the murder of a veteran homicide detective’s daughter right in front of her father. 24 year-old Emma Craven (Bojana Novakovic) was a recent MIT grad with a promising career doing scientific research for a company called Northmoor when she was shot to death in the doorway of her dad’s home.
Initially, everyone assumes that Thomas Craven (Gibson) was the intended target, since he was standing next to Emma at the time of the drive-by. And, in true Dirty Harry style, Tom opts to go rogue when his boss tries to take him off the case.
Craven soon discovers that something is suspicious when a lock he saved of his late daughter’s hair sets off a Geiger counter. The search for more clues about how she might have become exposed to the highly radioactive material leads to Northmoor Corporation which was secretly involved in some shady nuclear defense contracts with the U.S. government.
As it turns out, Emma is just the latest in a string of activist whistleblowers to end up the unfortunate victim of a state-sanctioned hit. But with a U.S. Senator (Damian Young), a CIA Agent (Ray Winstone) and Northmoor’s CEO (Danny Huston) all collaborating to cover-up the killings, it looks unlikely that Craven will be able to crack the conspiracy.
Directed by Martin Campbell who also handed the original TV version, The Edge of Darkness is a fast-paced political potboiler/revenge flick featuring an uneven mix of hokey sentiment (ala the ghost of Emma intermittently appearing to daddy) and two-fisted fare (ala Gibson kicking butt). Not surprisingly, the latter works, the former doesn’t, although it never gets so sappy as to undermine the overall effort.
A compelling cross of The Lovely Bones and No Way Out, only in Bostonese!

Very Good (2.5 stars)
Rated R for profanity and graphic violence.
Running time: 117 Minutes
Distributor: Warner Home Video
Blu-Ray/DVD/Digital Copy Combo Pack Extras: Featurettes “Revisiting the Edge of Darkness Miniseries,” “Mel’s Back,” “Director Profile: Martin Campbell,” “Bston as a Character,” and more.

The Lightkeepers

Film Review by Kam Williams

Headline: Misogynists Meet Their Matches in Cape Cod Costume Dramedy

 

                One of the best episodes of The Little Rascals was the He-Man Woman Haters Club in which Spanky and the gang promised each other they’d never associate with girls only to have Alfalfa break the pact by falling head over heels for adorable Darla. The Lightkeepers, directed by Daniel Adams (The Golden Boys), is an adult-oriented variation on the same basic theme, a character-driven dramedy with a point of departure of June of1912.

The film stars Richard Dreyfuss as Seth Atkins, the lonely keeper of the Eastham lighthouse, located at the tip of a peninsula on Cape Cod. As the film unfolds, we find Seth living by himself, but it isn’t long before he has himself a male companion when John Brown’s body (Tom Wisdom) washes ashore.

Once revived, the almost-drowned, young stranger claims to have fallen off a passing steamship, which is a good enough explanation for the crusty curmudgeon who could use a little company, given the distance to town. Better yet, when the pair get to talking, they discover they share a distaste for the opposite sex, having both been decidedly unlucky at love.

Seth has taken a vow of celibacy while John says he never even wants to see another woman for the rest of his life. So, this makes it easy for the frmer to hire the latter as his assistant, and the two peas in a pod agree to turn the lighthouse into a female-free zone. This understanding works great as long as there aren’t any within miles.

However, their plans for a testosterone-only oasis of solitude is ruined upon the arrival from Boston of Ruth Lowell (Mamie Gummer), a gorgeous, eligible young heiress accompanied by her equally-attractive domestic servant (Blythe Danner). It just so happens that the newcomers have rented a nearby beach cottage for the summer, and it is not lost on the audience that their ages quite conveniently match those of their misogynistic neighbors.

Thus, it’s no surprise when John’s hormones start to rage, and he’s soon taking long romantic strolls down the beach alongside the fair Ruth who’s appropriately attired in a tasteful outfit trimmed with pretty petticoats and a matching parasol. When Seth becomes aware of the sparks flying between them, the only mystery left is whether he’ll feel betrayed or simply fall prey himself to the womanly wiles of the fetching Ms. Bascom.

                A pleasant, if predictable, period piece to be savored as much for the breathtaking seascapes as for the deliberately-paced romantic roundelays.

 

Very Good (3 stars)

PG for smoking, mature themes and mild epithets.

Running time: 96 Minutes

Studio: New Films International

Kam's Kapsules: Weekly Previews That Make Choosing a Film Fun

OPENING THIS WEEK
Kam's Kapsules:
Weekly Previews That Make Choosing a Film Fun
by Kam Williams
For movies opening May 14, 2010


BIG BUDGET FILMS

Just Wright (PG for brief profanity and suggestive material) Queen Latifah and Common co-star in this romantic comedy about a physical therapist who finds herself falling for the professional basketball player she’s been hired to rehabilitate after a career-threatening knee injury. With Paula Patton, Phylicia Rashad, Pam Grier, and NBA Stars Dwight Howard, Dwayne Wade and Rashard Lewis.

Letters to Juliet (PG for crude humor, smoking and mild epithets) Romantic comedy about a recently-engaged American (Amanda Seyfried) vacationing with her preoccupied fiancĂ© (Gael Garcia Bernal) in Verona, Italy where she encourages an elderly Englishwoman (Vanessa Redgrave) to look for the long-lost love she hasn’t heard from in over half a century. Cast includes Daniel Baldock, Franco Nero and Lidia Biondi.

Robin Hood (PG-13 for sexuality and intense violence) Russell Crowe stars as the latest incarnation of the beloved, 13th C. legendary outlaw of English folklore who with his band of Merry Men rob from the rich to give to the poor. Directed by Ridley Scott, and featuring Cate Blanchett as Maid Marian, Mark Addy as Friar Tuck, Kevin Durand as Little John and Danny Huston as Richard the Lionhearted.


INDEPENDENT & FOREIGN FILMS

Barking Water (Unrated) Bittersweet road drama about a terminally-ill Native American (Richard Ray Whitman) whose is sprung from the hospital by his embittered ex-wife (Casey Camp-Horinek) for a death bed reconciliation with his estranged daughter (Zoe Ballentine) and the grandchild he’s never met. With Jon Proudstar, Aaron Riggs and Marcus Frejo.

Beetle Queen Conquers Tokyo (Unrated) Entomology documentary examines Japan’s long-term love affair with bugs. (In English and Japanese with subtitles)

Best Worst Movie (Unrated) Two thumbs down documentary revisits the making of Troll 2, the 1990 horror flick generally credited as the worst movie ever made.
Directed by the best-forgotten cult classic’s star, Michael Stephenson, who reassembled practically the entire cast to deconstruct exactly where they went wrong.

Daddy Longlegs (Unrated) Redemption drama about a prematurely-graying workaholic (Ronald Bronstein) who decides to turn a new leaf by spending some quality time with his young sons (Sage and Frey Ranaldo) during their annual, two week custody stay in his cramped, NYC studio apartment. With Wayne Chin, Leah Goldhor and Leah Singer as his ex.

Entre Nos (Unrated) NYC tale of survival about a Colombian immigrant’s (Paola Mendoza) desperate effort to provide for her two young children (Sebastian Villada Lopez and Laura Montana Cortez) after her husband (Andres Munar) abandons the family to movie to Miami alone. (In Spanish with subtitles)

Here and There (Unrated) Green Card comedy about a broke, NYC musician (David Thornton) who flies to Belgrade to marry a stranger (Jelena Mrdja) so she can immigrate to the United States only to find himself falling in love with another woman (Mirjana Karanovic) while waiting to get paid for participating in the sham. Supporting cast includes Cyndi Lauper, Antone Pagan and Max King. (In Serbo-Croatian and English)

The Living Wake (Unrated) Last day in the life comedy about an eccentric artist (Mike O’Connell) with less than 24 hours to live who with the help of a pal (Jesse Eisenberg) with a motorized rickshaw rides around town handing out invites to a party where he plans to drop dead at the end of the night. With Jim Gaffigan, Ann Dowd and Jill Larson.

Looking for Eric (Unrated) British farce, directed by Ken Loach, about a suicidal postman (Steve Evets) who escapes from his host of woes, including his mob-connected son (Gerard Kearns), by fantasizing about his favorite soccer star, Eric Cantona. Support cast includes Lucy-Jo Hudson, Stephanie Bishop and Stefan Gumbs. (In English and French with subtitles)

Princess Kaiulani (Unrated) Historical saga, set in 1888, starring Q’Orianka Kilcher in the title role as the 12 year-old Hawaiian heir whose family was overthrown while she was being educated in Victorian England where she fell in love with a local lad (Shaun Evans). With Will Patton, Barry Pepper and Tamzin Merchant. (In English and Hawaiian with subtitles)

Touching Home (PG-13 for profanity, smoking, drinking and brief profanity) Ed Harris stars in this true tale about a homeless alcoholic whose talented twin sons (Logan and Noah Miller) overcome their dysfunctional family life by growing up to become baseball prospects with the potential to make it to the pros. With Lee Meriwether, Brad Dourif and Robert Forster.

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Dirty Hands: The Art & Crimes of David Choe

Film Review by Kam Williams

Headline: Thrill-Seeking Graffiti Artist Seeks Redemption in Brash Bio-Pic

For some reason, the rules never meant anything to David Choe growing up. As a matter of fact, the rebellious Korean-American graffiti artist could care less about his grades or the law. Instead, the troubled young truant would play hooky and shoplift to ply his craft day or night on walls all over the City of Los Angeles. This meant that he had no problem stealing cans of spray paint and trespassing in order to deface public or private property.
He explains his personal philosophy as “I just want to destroy [expletive]“ with a defiant shrug in Dirty Hands: The Art & Crimes of David Choe, a dizzying bio-pic representing the phenomenal directorial debut of Harry Kim. Mr. Kim trailed his restless subject around the world for eight years, with ports of call as far afield as the Congo, Israel and Japan, where David landed in jail after punching a cop in the face.
It would be easy to dismiss this irresponsible wild child as a lost cause, given how he not only stole, but forged checks to support his habit. However, when he finally sought psychological counseling, it was determined that the otherwise very talented dude was suffering from a variety of mental maladies, including schizophrenia, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, ant-social behavior, bipolar disorder, kleptomania and sexual addiction.

That last one cost the kid the love of a good woman, the others just added up to make his life a holy mess. Nonetheless, David Choe eventually became Born Again, went legit, got his act together, and started landing lucrative corporate contracts to design stuff like an ad for Converse sneakers and a cover for a Jay-Z CD. And he recently sold out a show of $2.5 million worth of his painting at a show in an upscale London art gallery.
An alternately frightening and exhilarating, guerilla-style documentary showcasing the downs and ups of an amoral thrill-seeker lucky enough to bottom out and find redemption before it was too late to be given a last shot at rehabilitation.

Excellent (4 stars)
Unrated
In English and Korean with subtitles.
Running time: 93 Minutes
Studio: Upper Playground

Oprah: A Biography

 

 

by Kitty Kelley

The Crown Publishing Group

Hardcover, $30.00

560 pages

ISBN: 978-0-307-39486-6

 

Book Review by Kam Williams

 

“I’ve tried to … penetrate the myth in order to answer the eternal question: What’s she really like? In the process, I found a remarkable woman, hugely complicated and contradictory. Sometimes generous, magnanimous, and deeply caring. Sometimes petty, small-minded, and self-centered.

She has done an extraordinary amount of good and also backed products and ideas that are not only controversial but considered by many to be harmful. There is a warm side to Oprah and a side that can only be called as cold as ice.”

         -Excerpted from the Foreword (pg. xiv)

 

It was recently suggested that I was anti-Semitic by a highly-respected, Jewish intellectual who disagreed with my review of a documentary about the Arab-Israeli conflict. Since the allegations were totally unfounded, I contacted my accuser who nonetheless refused to retract his remarks. Both embarrassed and hurt, I ended up frustrated by the fact that I had nowhere to turn to get my reputation back.

I bring my up my painful experience as a prelude to a discussion of this sensational tell-all only to remind folks that despite the fact that Oprah is very rich and famous, she’s still a human being with feelings, too. Who knows how many of the unflattering revelations in this unauthorized tome are accurate, even if the author brags about never having been successfully sued for libel before?

I’ll say this, it certainly doesn’t seem as though anybody very close to Oprah cooperated with the project. But that didn’t prevent Kitty Kelley from coming up with enough scandalous material to keep you on the edge of your seat for the duration of her shocking 500+ page-turner.

Over the years, the poison pen biographer has dished the dirt on everyone from Jackie Onassis to Elizabeth Taylor to Frank Sinatra to Nancy Reagan to the Royal and Bush Families. In fact, on the first page of this one’s Foreword, Ms. Kelley hints that the book might be overdue payback for Oprah’s having disapproved of “Jackie Oh!” to her face on the set of a Baltimore morning show over a quarter century ago.

Regardless, this relentlessly-entertaining opus arrives laced with lots of juicy gossip for anyone interested in insinuation. For among the rumors given credence here are the notions that Oprah was never sexually-abused as a child, but rather that she was boy crazy and a teen prostitute. It also hints that she’s gay and had her gal pal Gayle King deliver $50,000 in cash to pay someone to keep quiet about her lesbian affairs. And she doesn’t share a bedroom with her longtime boyfriend Stedman Graham who is supposedly homosexual, too.

As to her eating issues, the book describes a vacation during which Oprah ate a couple of pecan pies in an hour while Stedman was out on the golf course. On another occasion, a hostess allegedly couldn’t get her last guest to leave a party at the end of the evening only because there was still a huge platter of food that hadn’t been touched.

According to this account, Oprah wouldn’t go, “until she devoured the whole thing.”

This flipside of the Winfrey you see on TV is said to be “cold, standoffish and very difficult.” Plus, she has a bad habit of lying about and turning her back on her friends. An endlessly amusing bio that's tons of fun to read until you pause to ponder whether this might merely be a case of character assassination.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Soledad O'Brien: The "Rescued" Interview

with Kam Williams

 

Headline: Soledad’s Follow-Up Report about the Haitian Relief Effort

 

Since Haiti’s no longer front-page news, it’s very easy to forget about the fact that there’s an ongoing crisis there in the wake of the devastating earthquake which hit the island on January 12th. Fortunately, CNN’s Soledad O’Brien stands out as a journalist who has remained very committed to keeping the story of the country’s recovery on the front burner.

She recently returned to the region to investigate the plight of the disaster’s most vulnerable victims – the kids. Interviewing locals, missionaries, aid workers, bureaucrats and children themselves, Soledad discovered not only that Haiti now has about 380,000 orphans, but that many have been sold into slavery. Their perilous predicament is the focus of Rescued, Soledad’s shocking special report which is set to premiere on CNN on Saturday May 8th at 8 PM.

Here, she talks about the riveting documentary, which will be voiceovered by Wyclef Jean and Edwidge Danticat and told from the perspectives of 6 year-old orphan Candy Jeune and a freed slave named Marc Kenson Oliphi.

 

Kam Williams: Hi, Soledad, thanks again for the time.

Soledad O’Brien: You bet.

KW: How are the kids? Last time we spoke, they played such a big role, demanding your attention periodically during the interview.

SO: [Chuckles] They’re fine, thanks. When I go back to Haiti in June and Sofia’s out of school, I’ll take her with me, which will be an interesting trip. And, from there, we’ll go to New Orleans, because she’s getting old enough to start touring some of the places I’ve worked.

KW: What interested you in covering this story?

SO: I don’t think you can walk around reporting on Haiti and be on the ground there, and not feel compelled by the story of the orphaned and abandoned children. When I was there immediately after the earthquake, there was certainly nothing as heart-wrenching as seeing the condition of many of the kids, because it’s such a massive problem. So, I was eager to cover the story for CNN with a potential global audience of two billion people.

KW: Two things that shocked me watching an advanced copy of the special: the sheer number of Haitian children without parents, 380,000, and the fact that about 300,000 of them are enslaved.

SO: It’s incredible, isn’t it? And that estimate is conservative. Some people put the number at around 1.5 million on the high side. That’s what I heard yesterday, but it’s just an educated guess at this point.

KW: What is the Haitian government doing about the fact that they have a situation where people are being enslaved?

SO: It’s such a hard thing for those of us in this country to get our minds around, but it’s completely legal. I’m sure you saw in the piece how the boy named Matthinson’s father sold him for about $12 dollars to go and be a slave for a complete stranger. But it’s an indication of just how devastating the poverty is in Haiti that that’s a viable option. It’s pervasive throughout the country. And unfortunately, it’s perfectly legal.

KW: Another segment I found compelling was the one about the missionary work of Bill and Suzette Manazarro. Why did you decide to include them?

SO: It was such a great story in a lot of ways, starting with Suzette and Bill’s philosophy of taking in children not to send them overseas for adoption, but to raise them right there so they can grow up to become productive, standup citizens and help rescue Haiti. The “Rescue” in our title refers not only to the Manazarros’ work but also the hope that the children might, in turn, rescue their own nation. I thought that was a very interesting strategy for a nation that’s just been through a devastating earthquake. It also helped that we came across a young man who had been shooting at their orphanage for a few years. His videotape enabled us to tell their story from 2007 to the present.

KW: You also said that about three-quarters of Haiti’s schools are in ruins. So, are the children being educated?

SO: In some cases, yes. I’m not sure of the latest status on that, because the situation is changing very rapidly. But the official schools have been ruined. They collapsed in the earthquake. In fact, the entire infrastructure of the children’s lives have pretty much collapsed. So many people, like Bill and Suzette, have set up their own schools for the kids in their care.

KW: What does Haiti need right now?

SO: Well, Kam, how much time do you have?

KW: Then answer this, how can someone who wants to get involved help Haiti?

SO: There are so many churches that have missions in Haiti. I’d say reach out and find an organization whose work you like and get connected through them.

KW: Dr. Karanja Ajanaku asks: What outcomes do you hope to have as a result of this special?

SO: I think one goal is just to keep the story of Haiti in the news, to keep people exposed to what’s going on in order to help them recognize the depth of the problem for orphans in a really cohesive way.

KW: I understand, because I was torn between interviewing a movie star this week and this opportunity to talk to you about Haiti again. I’ll be honest, I seriously debated it.

SO: I won the toss-up, then. [Laughs] I love to be able to get out an important message so that another journalist asks himself, “Hmm? Should I interview a starlet with a new hit movie or do an interview about this important story that still needs to be told?” I love that you wrestled with that. And that I won. So, journalism lives! I’m excited about that.

KW: Dr. Ajanaku has a follow-up: Did your reporting detect a relationship between skin color and poverty? And if so, how does that factor into the situation/condition/plight of the orphans?

SO: No, not really. But I’m not sure if he’s talking about black versus white or nuances in skin color, so I can’t say I totally understand the question.

KW: Larry Greenberg says that you previously mentioned the need for “opportunity" and "real infrastructure" in Haiti. He says, “I know it has not
been long and it may be just a few starfish back in the sea but have
you seen any improvements?”

SO: Yes, I did see some minor improvements, but it’ll be more interesting to look at the answer to that question when I go back next month.

KW: Daryle Lockhart wants to know if you think that a new, stronger Haiti will be a valuable ally to the US military. He says that the island's location would seem to make it incredibly important strategically.

SO: I think the answer is, yeah, probably, but that’s not the big problem right now. What Haiti needs is infrastructural repair, not a new military base or a great jumping-off point for U.S. Armed Forces. They need jobs for the people and care for the children, and a movement to address the child slavery issue. In my mind, all that stuff comes way before any questions about whether Haiti’s well-position to be a viable military base for the United States.

KW: Publisher Milton Allimadi says that he’s been inundated with calls and e-mails since they honored you at the Black Star News' annual dinner last November. He says thanks again and he was wondering whether it might be possible for you to address his journalism class about Haiti.

SO: It’s always possible. Certainly, one of the things that’s the most fun for me, even though it takes up a lot of my time, is talking to aspiring journalists. Yeah, there’s certainly ways to arrange that.

KW: William Cooper and Troy Johnson both asked essentially the same question. What did you put down on her census form? William pointed out that Obama checked off “black” when he is just as black as white. How do you self-identify?

SO: I find the question really ridiculous. All the schooling I have to do on this topic is wearing me out. Obama is black. His mother was white. I am black. My father is white. I’m going to give everybody a History 101 lesson. Some black people have white blood in them. This has been going on for many generations, people. Look at any family of black people. They run a range of colors. This is why.

KW: You and all five of your siblings graduated from Harvard, so I have to ask you what you think about Stephanie Grace, the Harvard Law student who recently sent out an email stating that she believes black people are genetically inferior to white people. Were you shocked by her statement?

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/04/29/stephanie-grace-racist-harvard-emailer/

SO: My first reaction was, “Well, who’s the dumb one?” If you’re going to talk about innate intelligence, maybe sending out that email is not the smart thing to do. That would make me ask, who’s the stupid one in this equation? But am I shocked? Sadly, no. I’m not even surprised.

KW: Well, Soledad, thanks again for another fun interview.

SO: Thank you so much for doing this story. We’re hoping that lots of folks watch Rescued, because it’ll be an indication that people want continued coverage of Haiti.

KW: I’ll certainly do my best to spread the word.

SO: Thanks, Kam, bye.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

A Nightmare on Elm Street

Film Review by Kam Williams

Headline: Remake of Classic Splatterflick Repeatedly Relies on Eroticized Violence as Entertainment


I must have missed something, because I don’t exactly remember the Eighties being the Golden Age of Entertainment.? Nonetheless, in lieu of coming up with some original ideas, Hollywood has decided to revisit a number of mostly underwhelming offerings from the decade as a source of cinematic inspiration. Consequently, 2010 is likely to be remembered as the year of the Eighties remakes, with Clash of the Titans already in theaters and new versions of The A-Team, The Karate Kid, Red Dawn, Tron and Wall Street all to follow.
Back in 1984, Wes Craven’s introduced the world to Freddy Krueger in A Nightmare on Elm Street, the grisly slasher flick which would spawn seven sequels before ostensibly petering out in 2003. Now, award-wining, music video director Samuel Bayer has revived the franchise, making a most-inauspicious feature film debut with this dreadful remake loosely based on the initial installment in the series.
The film stars Jackie Earle Haley as Krueger, an infamous, horror genre villain readily recognizable by his badly-disfigured face, striped sweater, brown fedora and the lethal glove equipped with long, razor-sharp blades used to hack his victims to death. The script’s fatal flaw is that it launches the killing machine headlong onto a bloody murder spree without establishing a premise or bothering to devote any attention to character development. Thus, because the audience hasn’t yet invested emotionally in the ensemble of fresh young faces serving as his prey, it’s impossible to feel much as they proceed to get picked off one by one.
What the production presumably is banking on is a basic familiarity with the original’s storyline, which is only revealed in piecemeal fashion for the initiated. In 25 words or less, Krueger is not human but a disembodied ghost who was burned alive a dozen years ago by a mob of parents whose preschoolers had accused him of sexual molestation. Today, Freddy seeks revenge by slaying each of the almost-grown kids twice, once by frightening them in their sleep and then for real while they’re awake.
Hence, an annoying plot device which wears out its welcome in the first five minutes (although it is repeated for the duration, ad nauseam) is that you never know whether what you’re watching is actually transpiring or just a dream sequence. This means someone might appear to be knocked off, only to sit bolt upright in bed in a cold sweat.
Worse is how the cast is cluttered with way too many teenagers to keep track of. Splatterflick fans might argue that keeping score is sort of besides the point, anyway, since the idea here is simply to delight in the messy, senseless, highly-eroticized vivisection. To each his own.
They don’t make movies worser than this.

Poor (0 stars)
Rated R for profanity, terror, disturbing images, and graphic bloody violence.
Running time: 96 Minutes
Distributor: New Line Cinema