Saturday, January 9, 2010

Youth in Revolt

Film Review by Kam Williams

Headline: Sitcom Features Michael Cera Yet Again as Terminally-Nerdy Teen

Despite turning 21, Michael Cera apparently has no problem remaining typecast as a terminally-nerdy teenager. Since appearing as an awkward geek in Superbad in 2007, we’ve seen the baby-faced thespian play slight variations of the same archetype in Juno, Nick & Norah’s Infinite Playlist, Paper Heart, Year One and, now, Youth in Revolt.
This time out, he’s Nick Twisp, a 16 year-old with raging hormones who’s obsessed with losing his virginity. How original! And the object of his injection is his proverbial girl next-door, Sheeni Saunders (Portia Doubleday), the prettiest girl living in their seedy trailer park.
Worse than that stale premise, is the script’s stilted dialogue, which must have been lifted verbatim from the picture’s source material, the six-part serial novel of the same name by C.D. Payne. How else can you explain Sheeni’s sounding so unnatural when asking Nick to put some suntan lotion on her back: “Would you mind applying this to my exposed areas?” How weird is that?
Worst of all is the profusion of colorful supporting characters providing practically non-stop comic relief via an array of increasingly bizarre behaviors. Each one is a simplistically-drawn stereotype. Consider Sheeni’s uptight, Bible-thumping parents (M. Emmet Walsh and Mary Kay Place) and her rebellious big brother (Justin Long) whose idea of a practical joke is to lace Thanksgiving dinner with hallucinogenic mushrooms which cause their father to smear mashed potatoes on his own face.
Then there’s Nick’s sexaholic mother Estelle (Jean Smart) who gets over the death of her live-in, loser boyfriend (Zach Galifianakis) by seducing the police officer (Ray Liotta) sent to inform her that he’s just dropped dead of a heart attack in the supermarket. Additional madcap antics arrive courtesy of a menagerie rounded out by Nick’s cradle-robbing father (Steve Buscemi), his 20 year-old girlfriend (Ari Graynor) and a goofy neighbor (Fred Willard) thrown in for good measure.
In order to summon up the courage to seduce Sheeni, Nick relies on encouragement from Francois Dillinger (also Cera), a suave alter ego sporting sunglasses and a pencil-thin moustache. But Francois’ ideas only set off a chain reaction leading legal trouble and leaving Nick facing the prospect of losing his virginity in jail. This and every other skit in this ill-conceived sketch flick falls flat.
As for Michael Cera’s career? Look a falling star! Make a wish!

Poor (½ star)
Rated R for sexuality, profanity and drug use.
Running time: 90 Minutes
Distributor: Dimension Films

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Your tag is a well known SNL slight. Readers will definitely recognize this.

Jonathan Potts said...

Micheal Cera type casted again? Sorry Kam but i don't think we saw the same movie. Micheal Cera finally had a chance to step out-side his stereotypical awkward nerd role with the help of his alter ego Francois. Francois is every thing Cera is not in any of his past movies, i.e. Super Bad, Year One and Juno. Francois is hilarious bold and is a completely original character for Cera. But what made the movie for me was not Francois sexual banter or bad ass mentality. It's when Micheal Cera is playing Nick you can see glimpses of Francois in his attitude. Take note in the scene where she first talks about Trent. He shoots down how appealing Trent is. Refers to him as "Freakishly Tall" and cracks a joke about how bad his poetry is. Then at the end of the movie he says She loves me and i believe it, and all it took was Nick Twisp. Meaning that Francois wasn't a completely different alter ego but more of a part of him, something he held inside but it was always him it was never Dillinger. As for the awkward sun screen scene Kam i don't know your age but do you remember being sixteen? it was really awkward, and even worse then being sixteen is a sexual aggressive girl who's intentions aren't clear to you, so it makes you uncomfortable.

- Jonathan Potts

I would love to hear a reply.

lacrossefreedom@hotmail.com

Aaron said...

You've missed the concept.

Anonymous said...

You are spot on. This was a terrible movie based on a terrible book. Cera should be ashamed.

Sarah said...

You're just blind to the genius aspects of the movie. I know that's condescending, but it's true. But to be fair, I don't this movie is going to appeal to a large audience over the age of 35.

I think to obtain authenticity in a story about teenagers, you have to at least mention sex. Sexuality, sexual confusion, and sexual anxiety are big parts of being a teen. I think the film touched on those themes very honestly.
I can't believe you used the phrase "How original!" when discussing this movie- a movie about a horny 16 year old is nothing new, but the way this story was presented and what it did with the premise is nothing but original. Watch it again. And don't say mean things about Michael Cera. He's a talented actor with more artistic integrity than the average actor twice his age.
BTW- the dialogue is supposed to be stilted and weird. The kids are pretentious and clever. At least they didn't punctuate with the word "like".

mario said...

this movie is funny ass hell!!!